ニューヨーク・タイムズのインスタグラム(nytimes) - 9月12日 09時48分

With a single scholarly article, this 29-year-old has reframed decades of monopoly law. In early 2017, as an unknown law student, Lina Khan published “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” in the Yale Law Journal. Her argument went against a consensus in antitrust circles that dates back to the 1970s — the moment when regulation was redefined to focus on consumer welfare, or price. Since @Amazon is renowned for its cut-rate deals, it would seem safe from federal intervention. But the issue Lina’s article really brought to the fore is this: Do we trust #Amazon, or any large company, to create our future? Amazon overwhelmingly dominates online commerce, employs more than half a million people and powers much of the internet itself. If competitors tremble at its ambitions, consumers are mostly delighted by its speedy delivery and low prices. “As consumers, as users, we love these tech companies,” said Lina, who was photographed here by @lexey. “But as citizens, as workers, and as entrepreneurs, we recognize that their power is troubling. We need a new framework, a new vocabulary for how to assess and address their dominance.” Visit the link in our profile to read more.

[BIHAKUEN]UVシールド(UVShield)

>> 飲む日焼け止め！「UVシールド」を購入する